Civil Law

American Signature, Inc. v. US

(U.S. Fed. Cir., Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law, Government Law, International Law, International Trade) In proceedings involving an importer of furniture that is subject to a 2005 antidumping duty order on certain entries of wooden bedroom furniture from China, a decision of the Court of International Trade denying plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is reversed as plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction, and therefore, the Court of International Trade is directed to grant the preliminary injunction prohibiting Customs or Commerce from taking any action to liquidate or reliquidate import entries that are the subject of this action.
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Anchor Sav. Bank, FSB v. US

(U.S. Fed. Cir., Banking Law, Civil Procedure, Government Law, M&A, Remedies) In one of the last Winstar cases arising out of the savings and loan crisis of the late 1970s and early 1980s, involving a plaintiff's suit alleging that the adoption of the FIRREA and its implementing regulations breached the government's obligations under the supervisory merger contracts, judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff is affirmed in part and remanded in part where: 1) the trial court did not commit clear err in finding that it was foreseeable that the breach would result in lost profits to plaintiff in an amount commensurate with the ultimate award for lost profits; 2) the trial court did not err in finding of a causal connection between the government's breach of contract and plaintiff's sale of RFC (a mortgage banking company); 3) the trial court did not err in awarding lost profit damages attributable to plaintiff's forced sale of RFC; 4) the trial court permissibly concluded that NAMCO (mortgage company) was a reasonable commercial substitute for RFC, and its purchase thus qualified as mitigation for the loss of RFC; but 5) the case is remanded to allow the trial court to determine whether an error was made in offsetting plaintiff's mitigation costs by NAMCO's retained earnings through 1997 and, if so, how to correct the error.
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Clos v. Corrections Corp. of Am.

(U.S. 8th Cir., Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure, Health Law) In an action by a prisoner claiming that he suffered disability discrimination related to his severe hearing loss, plaintiff's appeal from partial summary judgment for defendants is dismissed where the district court's conclusory order provided no basis for a finding that plaintiff would face hardship or injustice by waiting to appeal until his remaining claim against defendants was fully resolved.
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Fortis Corp. Ins. SA. v. Viken Ship Mgmt. AS

(U.S. 6th Cir., Admiralty, Civil Procedure, Commercial Law, Government Law, Injury And Tort Law, Insurance Law, Transportation) In a maritime shipping case involving a claim for rust damage to steel coils caused by exposure to seawater during a journey from Poland to Ohio, judgment of the district court is affirmed where: 1) a ship manager charged with providing a Master, officers and crew, and performing various other ship-management tasks for the shipping vessel does not qualify as a "carrier" under the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA), and thus the COGSA's one year-statute of limitations does not bar the underlying suit; and 2) defendant's claim that the district court's finding of negligence was based on clearly erroneous factual findings is rejected.
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Hesse v. Sprint Corp.

(U.S. 9th Cir., Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Communications Law, Consumer Protection Law, Tax Law) In a class action alleging that defendant Sprint Corp. unlawfully collected a Washington state tax from Washington customers, summary judgment for defendant is vacated and remanded where a prior class action settlement challenged Sprint's billing of customers for certain federal regulatory fees, and the Washington plaintiffs' interests were not adequately represented in that litigation.
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Subscribe Now!

Free Legal Knowledge

Listen Radio Talk Show

Contact Us



Andrew D. Stine, P.A.

120 S. Olive Ave.
Suite 402
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Office: (561) 832-1170
Fax: (561) 832-1544

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.