Immigration Law

Vila v. US Atty. Gen.

(U.S. 11th Cir., Administrative Law, Immigration Law) In a petition for review of the BIA's denial of petitioner's application for a waiver of inadmissibility, the petition is denied where, because petitioner's approved I-140 visa petition did not make him a lawful resident under section 212(h) when the Immigration and Naturalization Service formally approved his application for adjustment, petitioner did not lawfully reside continuously in the U.S. for the seven years preceding the initiation of his removal proceedings on October 25, 2003.
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Najmabadi v. Holder

(U.S. 9th Cir., Administrative Law, Immigration Law) In a petition for review of the BIA's order denying petitioner's motion to reopen her removal proceedings on the basis of changed conditions in Iran, the petition is denied where: 1) substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that the evidence petitioner submitted in her motion to reopen was not qualitatively different from the evidence presented at the original hearing; and 2) there was no evidence establishing that returnees from the U.S. would likely face persecution.
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Sadhvani v. Holder

(U.S. 4th Cir., Administrative Law, Government Law, Immigration Law) A petition for review by a native of Togo of the BIA's denial of his motion to reopen asylum application is denied as the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner's motion based on the statutory requirement that one must be present in the United States to be eligible for asylum, and here, because petitioner was removed pursuant to a valid order of removal, he no longer can pursue his asylum application.
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Tampubolon v. Holder

(U.S. 9th Cir., Administrative Law, Immigration Law) In a petition for review of the BIA's denial of petitioners' asylum application, the petition is granted in part where the BIA erred in failing to apply disfavored group analysis to petitioners' withholding claim because the record compelled a finding that Christians in Indonesia are a disfavored group. However, the petition is denied in part where the BIA's failure to address two irrelevant cases did not render the proceeding fundamentally unfair.
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Thu v. Holder

(U.S. 8th Cir., Administrative Law, Evidence, Immigration Law) In a petition for review of the BIA's order dismissing his appeal from a denial of petitioner's asylum application and related relief, the petition is denied where: 1) the Immigration Judge's credibility finding was supported by specific, cogent reasons for disbelief; and 2) the evidence in the record was not so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:00:02 GMT

Subscribe Now!

Free Legal Knowledge

Listen Radio Talk Show

Contact Us



Andrew D. Stine, P.A.

120 S. Olive Ave.
Suite 402
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Office: (561) 832-1170
Fax: (561) 832-1544

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.